The abortion issue…

Yeah, I know a lot of folks have opinions on this topic. Women will say “Its my body and I can do anything I want with it.” Some people will invoke religion or religious points of view to sway opinions. Whatever your viewpoint is, consider this… Over a 1.175 million abortions are carried out in the United States each year. Since Roe v. Wade (1973), over 55.7 million unborn children have been killed via abortions. That’s 9 times more deaths than the Jewish people suffered during the Holocaust, yet no one really shows any concern over it. Have we reached a point where human life is so cheap that its gets no more attention than a passing comment or half a thought? Check this ABORTION COUNTER out. It shows the accumulative abortions performed since Roe v Wade in 1973.

The Liberals will bitch and moan about the ‘children’, the ‘poor’, the death penalty, etc… and try to draw comparisons that conservatives are heartless people because many believe in capital punishment but not abortion ‘rights’. They say conservatives cannot be pro-life and believe in the death penalty at the same time. Really? What crimes have the unborn committed to justify their termination? How does the life of an unborn child compare to one sentenced for a capital crime?

Let’s break this down to the basics. Here in the United States, abortions occur as a reaction to an unwanted pregnancy, not as a way to prevent the ‘death of the mother’, ‘rape’, ‘incest’, etc., as often argued by those who promote access to abortions. This year alone, 11, 400 abortions were attributed to rape or incest. This number is astounding. That means only 31.23 out of 2,160 abortions are carried out each day because of incest or rape. Can one really argue that the rest of the abortions were to ‘save the life of the mother’? Highly doubtful! So, I think it can safely be concluded, that abortions are really just another form of birth control. Nothing more, nothing less.

Welfare, corporate vs social.

We’ve all heard the term ‘corporate welfare’. What exactly is corporate welfare? Why is it used? What is social welfare? What is the difference between corporate welfare and social welfare?

 

Corporate welfare: Corporate welfare is a sociological concept that tries to compare corporate subsidies to societal welfare. The term is often used derogatorily to describe a government’s use of grants, tax breaks, or other favorable treatment towards corporations. It also implies that corporations are much less needy of such treatment than the poor.

Why is corporate welfare used?: There are a number of reasons why tax breaks and other incentives are given to corporations. They include trying to revitalize a section of a city with new job opportunities by bring in new businesses or keeping established businesses from leaving.  Or, to perform a service the government is woefully inadequate or lack the expertise to perform… and may also help train the local workforce with skills that could be used to gain employment elsewhere.

Social welfare: Social welfare is basically society paying the way for the poor with little or no expectations of the poor to become self sufficient.

What is the difference between the two?: Its obvious, if one were to compare the two side by side… corporate welfare provides jobs and indirectly, taxes, via a sustained or increasing workforce. Social welfare provides nothing but a free handout to people in the name of ‘compassion’.

 

My conclusion: More than a trillion dollars have been spent since Lyndon Johnson’s ‘Great Society’ and what do we have to show for it? More people now are on welfare than ever before. The truth is this… there will always be segment of the population on the bottom rungs of the socio-economic ladder. That’s just a fact of life. The great experiment, known as the United States, does not promise equal opportunities or equal outcomes. It holds out the chance to make something of yourselves and achieving your dreams on your terms. It holds that same opportunity out to each subsequent generation. In my opinion, societal welfare, over time, robs people of their dignity, their character, and  in the end… their dreams. It does this because there is no expectation of them to perform or to better themselves. Its much easier to let someone else take care of their basic needs than to earn their own way in life… to be responsible for their actions and accept the consequences of their choices. To me, this is sinful.

Translate »